![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
A simple reminder.
Feb. 6th, 2009 03:25 amMatters of law are meant to be tried and decided within the framework of the law, not the court of public opinion.
Anyone trying to convince you otherwise has an ulterior motive.
In related news, on March 5th, 2009, from 9am to 12pm, the California Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the matters of Strauss v. Horton, Tyler v. State of California, and City and County of San Francisco v. Horton.![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
joedecker reports that The California Channel will be broadcasting the events live.
The California Channel also does streaming webcasts, so even if you can't make it to the courtroom in San Francisco, you may be able to watch the proceedings from the comfort of your own browser. They only publish their schedule a week in advance, but check the listings the first week of March to see if it'll be webcast. I plan to liveblog the proceedings here, for my own entertainment and that of anyone else who happens to enjoy my admittedly biased commentary. :)
Anyone trying to convince you otherwise has an ulterior motive.
In related news, on March 5th, 2009, from 9am to 12pm, the California Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the matters of Strauss v. Horton, Tyler v. State of California, and City and County of San Francisco v. Horton.
joedecker reports that The California Channel will be broadcasting the events live. The California Channel also does streaming webcasts, so even if you can't make it to the courtroom in San Francisco, you may be able to watch the proceedings from the comfort of your own browser. They only publish their schedule a week in advance, but check the listings the first week of March to see if it'll be webcast. I plan to liveblog the proceedings here, for my own entertainment and that of anyone else who happens to enjoy my admittedly biased commentary. :)
