Meredith L. Patterson ([identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] maradydd 2008-04-13 01:26 am (UTC)

But the point that both I and the Copyright Office are making is that it should not be possible for a work to be "orphaned" without the original holder's consent; if the original holder pops up and says "wait, that's mine," then the work is not orphaned, by default.

Right now, there is no legal definition of "orphaned works"; the point of any legislation about them would be to create such a definition and the law surrounding its application.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org