That's one of my concerns also. I feel bad, but the interview that I heard the law from dumbed it down to saying that the company can pretty much set the price for how much they thing is fair, meaning that photo that could've given him a good lump of cash he can only sue for 50 bucks, according to what VS believes is fair (using your example company)

I really hope this isn't the extreme that the bill can be taken to because if that's the case...man. we're soooo screwed,lol!