Re: Via Metafandom

Date: 2008-04-20 06:39 am (UTC)
I'm confused. All I want to do is preserve family history for my genealogy research.


This is one of the main reasons that orphaned works legislation, in some form, is a good idea. There's a lot of concern about it being abused to deprive artists of their rights, but it leaves people in the kind of situation that you describe -- confused, because the laws are not clear. A solution that addresses the concerns raised, but also clarifies your case, is one that I see as ideal.

Note I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice, but...

You're probably fine reproducing those photos yourself, but the real complication comes in on the issue of doing so "for-profit", so if you want a commercial firm to do the reproduction/archiving, you might find you aren't able to if they are concerned about the copyright issues. If the laws were less confusing, and the issue of "when the copyright status of a work is impossible to determine" were explicitly covered, people would know what the law was, in order to follow it.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

maradydd: (Default)
maradydd

September 2010

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415 161718
19202122232425
26 27282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags