I think perhaps that, while Mark Simon's article was easily one of the poorest written articles I've ever read (and as such it is easy to dismiss the content of his message), it is these kinds of bills that companies use to exploit artists. And, as such, the bill is worth scrutinizing closely and, if it seems potentially harmful (even if it is something that could be used in a way that isn't intended by the bill itself) possibly speaking out against.
one more thought
I think perhaps that, while Mark Simon's article was easily one of the poorest written articles I've ever read (and as such it is easy to dismiss the content of his message), it is these kinds of bills that companies use to exploit artists. And, as such, the bill is worth scrutinizing closely and, if it seems potentially harmful (even if it is something that could be used in a way that isn't intended by the bill itself) possibly speaking out against.