maradydd: (Default)
[personal profile] maradydd
Gel electrophoresis is one of the most versatile, widely used tools in a microbiologist's or geneticist's toolbox. It's used for separating out DNA, RNA or protein molecules (that you presumably isolated in a previous step of your experiment) based on their molecular weight, so that you can analyze the molecules, clone them, amplify them with PCR, sequence them, lots of different things.

Electrophoresis does require some equipment to perform -- an inner tray which holds the gel, an outer tray which holds a "running buffer" solution (which keeps things cool and keeps pH stable), electrodes, and a power supply (50V-150V is pretty common). You can buy a gel box from a commercial supplier, though they're not cheap, and a fancy power supply will set you back even more; Bio-Rad has some nice ones, but they run to the thousands of dollars.

Happily, there are solutions for the biohacker on a budget. The University of Utah's genetics department has full specs for how to build your own gel box for about $25 in parts (not counting the power supply, which will run you about $50). The main components are clear acrylic and acrylic cement, which I purchased and had cut to size at TAP Plastics -- they also do mail order. My partner-in-science Tito Jankowski built one too, and did some test runs with food colouring which enabled him to separate the individual dyes which make up different colours. (The molecules in food colouring are pretty small, which is why the bands in Tito's video are a little smeary. He used agarose -- an edible, seaweed-derived polymer which you can find on the shelf in any Asian grocery store, also sold as "vegan gelatin" -- as his gel, and agarose is better suited to larger molecules like DNA. But it's definitely a proof of concept!)

Still, electrophoresis using large rectangular gels has some drawbacks. It's a bit messy, and in order to recover the particular band of DNA you want, you have to slice it out of the gel with a razor blade or something similar. Cleaning up the equipment is also a bit of a pain. If you're using acrylamide or polyacrylamide (common for protein electrophoresis), you need to find a safe way to get the used gel out of the gel carrier and dispose of it properly. Also, while DNA electrophoresis is run horizontally, protein electrophoresis is done vertically, so that means two different pieces of equipment.

This was a recent topic of discussion on the DIYbio mailing list. Ben Lipkowitz wondered whether it would be possible to use a narrow, rigid tube to contain the gel, rather than a big carrier. This would allow for the use of less buffer and lower voltage, since a physically smaller amount of gel is a smaller resistor.

Well, what's a narrow rigid tube that's easy for anyone to acquire? A clear drinking straw! Paper clips make for appropriately sized electrodes, and since a drinking straw is rigid, it can be used in either the horizontal or the vertical orientation. For extra bonus points, when you're ready to cut a band out of the gel, no need for mucking around with razor blades -- just take a (sterile) pair of scissors, snip snip, and you're done! Plus, disposal is extra simple, even with polyacrylamide -- just dispose of the entire straw, gel and all, properly.

Tito Jankowski tried this out, using a single 9V battery as a power supply, and after some debugging, it worked beautifully. (He also used alligator clips as electrodes, and they worked just fine.) We're calling these "keiki gels" because they're so small and cute -- and so simple, even a little kid can do them.

This is crowdsourced science at its very finest. Behold the power of collaboration!

Tito's keiki gels!


ETA: Tito wrote a protocol, doo dah, doo dah
Page 2 of 5 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 05:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com
Hey, there's a reason why my Gmail username is 'clonearmy'. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 05:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enochsmiles.livejournal.com
BTW, if we wanted to try the suggestion [livejournal.com profile] feyandstrange had, regarding the diner straw-holders, they are still in wide usage here in Europe (the McDonalds has them!) and maybe the problem I mentioned before could be dealt with by putting some long, thin "vents" in the base, to help push through the agar.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 05:47 am (UTC)
michiexile: (Default)
From: [personal profile] michiexile
Soon you will either (a) form some sort of geek black hole, or (b) reach geek critical mass and chain out.

You mean she hasn't yet? What on EARTH do you call her current state in that case??

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 06:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mutiny.livejournal.com
Can I use this to find out exactly who the father of somebody's baby is?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 06:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com
Next step is sequencing, chromosome identification and stuff like that. We're working on it!

WOW

Date: 2009-02-07 06:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nicaprio.blogspot.com (from livejournal.com)
Freaking bloody amazing, my name is Quetzal a molecular biologist to be in my last days in the university here in mexico city, and i have been crying because without being able to enter to my school lab, i been due with my final project that is the identification and isolation of a protein, but this, THIS, is just amazing, i will have plenty of material and time in home to rush some items in my work. Lady, this work is a bless.

Of course i will need to check the protocol and try it by myself, but maybe with this i will have a degree before time.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU.

TRULY YOURS (WHENEVER YOU WANT)

QUETZAL HERNANDEZ

Re: WOW

Date: 2009-02-07 06:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com
Oh, awesome! Please get in touch with Tito ASAP (his blog's at titojankowski.com), he can answer any questions you have about the protocol he worked up -- and if your work in turn can help us improve this for everyone, then that will be really fantastic!

So glad to be of help. :)

crazy straws...

Date: 2009-02-07 07:03 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Again, completely brilliant.

Have you seen this? http://www.pacificbiosciences.com/index.php?q=observation-window

Re: crazy straws...

Date: 2009-02-07 07:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com
Damn, and just one molecule of Taq in each well! I want to know how they made these. Thanks for the link!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Thank you for sharing this idea. What can we use as a buffer that might be as inexpensive?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 12:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com
Tris-borate-EDTA is great if you can get it (it's not restricted or anything, just a little expensive), but if not, plain old salt water works just fine. A pinch of salt per cup of water is plenty.

imaging

Date: 2009-02-07 01:58 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
So the real problem I envision is post gel imaging.

For DNA: Are the straws UV transparent? Can you get straws that are?

For proteins: There is no easy way to get the whole strip of gel out of the straw is there? It would be hard to further stain the protein. Maybe if you placed the straw horizontally in a tray and filled the tray so that only half of the straw was filled with gel horizontally. That way you could just chuck the straw in coomasie and stain your protein or cut the straw lengthwise and transfer the protein on to nitrocellulose or PVDF.

Re: imaging

Date: 2009-02-07 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com
Maybe if you placed the straw horizontally in a tray and filled the tray so that only half of the straw was filled with gel horizontally.

That's a great idea! Definitely worth a shot when we try this for PAGE. (I haven't worked with polyacrylamide yet, but the idea totally makes sense.) We could try it out now with agarose and DNA, too, using methylene blue.

On the UV transparency issue: not sure, but that doesn't strike me as a showstopper, as there are gel stains you can add to the warm agarose that work just as well with blue light as they do with UV.
Edited Date: 2009-02-07 02:08 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 03:09 pm (UTC)
ext_74: Baron Samadai in cat form (Angel cat)
From: [identity profile] siliconshaman.livejournal.com
Occurs to me that if you picked up a secondhand computer, or just the pSU, you'd have a regulated 5vdc or 12vdc power supply which you could use together with a modified audio amplifier [or the dc voltage step up circuit from an inkjet printer] to step up the voltage and act as a cheap lab supply for this. You could probably get all the parts you'd need on freecycle.

Oh, and most plastics are UV transparent btw..

!/2 filled straw....horizontal..cutting..

Date: 2009-02-07 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
...once you want to cut the straw don,t use scissors or a blade...use a tool from your notions dept. (seeing) called a seam ripper ...Perfect for slicing open straws longitudinally...that's all,PEACE ,bye Dr Mark

straw cutting...

Date: 2009-02-07 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That's seWing not seeing....Dr.MARK

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 06:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tdj.livejournal.com
Passing along to the DeCal class that works with high schoolers! Thanks.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 07:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] renwick.livejournal.com
Now I just need to figure out how to make my own restriction enzymes...

Straws v.s. Flat 2D gells

Date: 2009-02-07 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dirkx.webweaving.org (from livejournal.com)
If memory serves me correctly; was not the whole point historically for going from straws to flat 2D spaces that these worked better: more reliable to compare (dV/dA ratio lower; and hence ^2 error margin); ability to use low (agar) concentrations and comparable or better separation - whilst less surface/jump boundary corruption in the eV field. Or have I missed something and is this not a step back?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-07 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
MWM needed

Re: Straws v.s. Flat 2D gells

Date: 2009-02-07 10:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrtee.livejournal.com
You are correct. Leading edge effect of current flow at the gel boundery.

Slightly off-topic but...

Date: 2009-02-08 02:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drdubious.livejournal.com
"ETA: Tito wrote a protocol, doo dah, doo dah"

You're kidding me - you mean I'm not the ONLY one who can't help but mentally insert a "Doo dah, doo dah" after any 7-syllable utterance with the right cadence?...

Re: imaging

Date: 2009-02-08 04:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madeofmeat.livejournal.com
One might get away with dunking the straw in hot water for a bit, then poking the gel out one end with a little dowel or chopstick.

Drinking straw electrophoresis - Removal Method

Date: 2009-02-08 05:33 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hi
I just stumbled here from Boing Boing and have no experience with your DNA gel. So I don't know what would happen to the quality of your gel sample if it were to be frozen. However, if freezing the sample without damaging it is possible, you might try this for extracting the cores:

First, freeze the gel-straw. Then, hold it gently in your hand so that your body heat slightly warms the plastic straw, but leaves the gel inside still frozen. This should create a slippery film between the wall of the straw and the gel. Finally, using a sterile plunger (pipette?) of the appropriate size, push the gel out of the straw and into your chosen container.
I hope this helps you guys,
Brian

Drinking straw electrophoresis!

Date: 2009-02-08 07:43 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I have stumbled here from slashdot. I have been doing electrophoresis (agarose and PAGE) for over 20 years now. Some comments about the discussion on this page:

1. You can remove agarose from the straw. Agarose should be relatively concentrated (>1% for most types). Then use a syringe with a blunt needle and push water around the wall. Agarose tube will slide out. This takes some practice.

2. There are multiple reasons for slab gel, as oposed to tube. Primary ones are: a) ability to compare samples when run on parallel tracks in the slab; b) easy preparation/analysis.

3. Polyacrylamide gels are hard to make in an open atmosphere (not between 2 pieces of glass)-oxygen in the air inhibits polimerization.

4. DNA fingerprinting and gel electrophoresis are not the same. The latter is a method of separation of molecules by charge, and not in intself "fingerprinting".

5. No, one cannot substitute a $1000 piece of equipment with a $50 worth of parts. While DIY is a perfect way to get to proof of concept or to play with it, $1000 equipment costs this much because it provides precision, reliability and reproducibility not achievable with $50. BTW, commercial power supply that will do what you are describing will cost ~$200, not $1000. The gel box as described was and still is used in many labs with the exception of the wire used to provide current to the solution. In mol.bio. labs people use platinum wire.
Page 2 of 5 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

Profile

maradydd: (Default)
maradydd

September 2010

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415 161718
19202122232425
26 27282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags