Entry tags:
Drinking straw electrophoresis!
Gel electrophoresis is one of the most versatile, widely used tools in a microbiologist's or geneticist's toolbox. It's used for separating out DNA, RNA or protein molecules (that you presumably isolated in a previous step of your experiment) based on their molecular weight, so that you can analyze the molecules, clone them, amplify them with PCR, sequence them, lots of different things.
Electrophoresis does require some equipment to perform -- an inner tray which holds the gel, an outer tray which holds a "running buffer" solution (which keeps things cool and keeps pH stable), electrodes, and a power supply (50V-150V is pretty common). You can buy a gel box from a commercial supplier, though they're not cheap, and a fancy power supply will set you back even more; Bio-Rad has some nice ones, but they run to the thousands of dollars.
Happily, there are solutions for the biohacker on a budget. The University of Utah's genetics department has full specs for how to build your own gel box for about $25 in parts (not counting the power supply, which will run you about $50). The main components are clear acrylic and acrylic cement, which I purchased and had cut to size at TAP Plastics -- they also do mail order. My partner-in-science Tito Jankowski built one too, and did some test runs with food colouring which enabled him to separate the individual dyes which make up different colours. (The molecules in food colouring are pretty small, which is why the bands in Tito's video are a little smeary. He used agarose -- an edible, seaweed-derived polymer which you can find on the shelf in any Asian grocery store, also sold as "vegan gelatin" -- as his gel, and agarose is better suited to larger molecules like DNA. But it's definitely a proof of concept!)
Still, electrophoresis using large rectangular gels has some drawbacks. It's a bit messy, and in order to recover the particular band of DNA you want, you have to slice it out of the gel with a razor blade or something similar. Cleaning up the equipment is also a bit of a pain. If you're using acrylamide or polyacrylamide (common for protein electrophoresis), you need to find a safe way to get the used gel out of the gel carrier and dispose of it properly. Also, while DNA electrophoresis is run horizontally, protein electrophoresis is done vertically, so that means two different pieces of equipment.
This was a recent topic of discussion on the DIYbio mailing list. Ben Lipkowitz wondered whether it would be possible to use a narrow, rigid tube to contain the gel, rather than a big carrier. This would allow for the use of less buffer and lower voltage, since a physically smaller amount of gel is a smaller resistor.
Well, what's a narrow rigid tube that's easy for anyone to acquire? A clear drinking straw! Paper clips make for appropriately sized electrodes, and since a drinking straw is rigid, it can be used in either the horizontal or the vertical orientation. For extra bonus points, when you're ready to cut a band out of the gel, no need for mucking around with razor blades -- just take a (sterile) pair of scissors, snip snip, and you're done! Plus, disposal is extra simple, even with polyacrylamide -- just dispose of the entire straw, gel and all, properly.
Tito Jankowski tried this out, using a single 9V battery as a power supply, and after some debugging, it worked beautifully. (He also used alligator clips as electrodes, and they worked just fine.) We're calling these "keiki gels" because they're so small and cute -- and so simple, even a little kid can do them.
This is crowdsourced science at its very finest. Behold the power of collaboration!

ETA: Tito wrote a protocol, doo dah, doo dah
Electrophoresis does require some equipment to perform -- an inner tray which holds the gel, an outer tray which holds a "running buffer" solution (which keeps things cool and keeps pH stable), electrodes, and a power supply (50V-150V is pretty common). You can buy a gel box from a commercial supplier, though they're not cheap, and a fancy power supply will set you back even more; Bio-Rad has some nice ones, but they run to the thousands of dollars.
Happily, there are solutions for the biohacker on a budget. The University of Utah's genetics department has full specs for how to build your own gel box for about $25 in parts (not counting the power supply, which will run you about $50). The main components are clear acrylic and acrylic cement, which I purchased and had cut to size at TAP Plastics -- they also do mail order. My partner-in-science Tito Jankowski built one too, and did some test runs with food colouring which enabled him to separate the individual dyes which make up different colours. (The molecules in food colouring are pretty small, which is why the bands in Tito's video are a little smeary. He used agarose -- an edible, seaweed-derived polymer which you can find on the shelf in any Asian grocery store, also sold as "vegan gelatin" -- as his gel, and agarose is better suited to larger molecules like DNA. But it's definitely a proof of concept!)
Still, electrophoresis using large rectangular gels has some drawbacks. It's a bit messy, and in order to recover the particular band of DNA you want, you have to slice it out of the gel with a razor blade or something similar. Cleaning up the equipment is also a bit of a pain. If you're using acrylamide or polyacrylamide (common for protein electrophoresis), you need to find a safe way to get the used gel out of the gel carrier and dispose of it properly. Also, while DNA electrophoresis is run horizontally, protein electrophoresis is done vertically, so that means two different pieces of equipment.
This was a recent topic of discussion on the DIYbio mailing list. Ben Lipkowitz wondered whether it would be possible to use a narrow, rigid tube to contain the gel, rather than a big carrier. This would allow for the use of less buffer and lower voltage, since a physically smaller amount of gel is a smaller resistor.
Well, what's a narrow rigid tube that's easy for anyone to acquire? A clear drinking straw! Paper clips make for appropriately sized electrodes, and since a drinking straw is rigid, it can be used in either the horizontal or the vertical orientation. For extra bonus points, when you're ready to cut a band out of the gel, no need for mucking around with razor blades -- just take a (sterile) pair of scissors, snip snip, and you're done! Plus, disposal is extra simple, even with polyacrylamide -- just dispose of the entire straw, gel and all, properly.
Tito Jankowski tried this out, using a single 9V battery as a power supply, and after some debugging, it worked beautifully. (He also used alligator clips as electrodes, and they worked just fine.) We're calling these "keiki gels" because they're so small and cute -- and so simple, even a little kid can do them.
This is crowdsourced science at its very finest. Behold the power of collaboration!

ETA: Tito wrote a protocol, doo dah, doo dah
no subject
You can make a perfectly fine slab agarose gel by taping together pieces of glass or plastic. I don't think you're going to get usable results with DNA using agar. Those dye bands are very huge and smeary, and DNA is not going to migrate any tighter. The size of the molecule affects the rate of migration through the gel, but it doesn't make the band itself any tighter. The size of the band is a function of the percentage agarose and the quality of the casting. You might get usable results by running tube gels in parallel, but they would need to be cast from the same batch because small variations in agarose concentration will have a big effect on the results.
You would need a good number of drinking straws do sequence a whole genome. (LOL) I believe Celera actually used capillary electrophopresis (shotgun method) for the human genome project.
no subject
FWIW, dye bands are huge and smeary in a rectangular gel as well; there's a video of them migrating on his blog. So I am pretty sure that DNA bands in a straw will come out cleaner than the dye bands as well.
We'll be doing some more tests with lambda DNA soon, and I'll post an update when that happens.
And yeah, based on comments upthread, it should be pretty easy to cast hundreds if not upward of a thousand straws at the same time.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://www.nexusresearchgroup.com/fun_science/electrophoresis.htm
There's also a nice picture of a gel run with food coloring dyes.
I think you would really enjoy taking some classes in biochemistry and genetics. The theoretical grounding would help you make better decisions about your techniques and goals, even if you do continue working in your home.
no subject
That said, I'm proud to be an amateur. My ultimate goals are exploration, learning, and lowering the barrier to entry for other people. I'm also fundamentally an autodidact. Some of my projects will fail. Some of them will succeed up to a point and get no further. And, frankly, I'm okay with that. Hell, Real Scientists(tm) have that problem too. (Being a Real Scientist(tm) in another field, I feel I can say that with authority. ;) )
no subject
I'm not trying to insult you, but I will say that you will be more successful if you have a theoretical grounding in the science. So you are an autodidact. What have you read? Maybe I can give you some recommendations.
Amateur research
(Anonymous) 2009-05-19 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)