maradydd: (Default)
maradydd ([personal profile] maradydd) wrote2009-02-07 02:42 am
Entry tags:

Drinking straw electrophoresis!

Gel electrophoresis is one of the most versatile, widely used tools in a microbiologist's or geneticist's toolbox. It's used for separating out DNA, RNA or protein molecules (that you presumably isolated in a previous step of your experiment) based on their molecular weight, so that you can analyze the molecules, clone them, amplify them with PCR, sequence them, lots of different things.

Electrophoresis does require some equipment to perform -- an inner tray which holds the gel, an outer tray which holds a "running buffer" solution (which keeps things cool and keeps pH stable), electrodes, and a power supply (50V-150V is pretty common). You can buy a gel box from a commercial supplier, though they're not cheap, and a fancy power supply will set you back even more; Bio-Rad has some nice ones, but they run to the thousands of dollars.

Happily, there are solutions for the biohacker on a budget. The University of Utah's genetics department has full specs for how to build your own gel box for about $25 in parts (not counting the power supply, which will run you about $50). The main components are clear acrylic and acrylic cement, which I purchased and had cut to size at TAP Plastics -- they also do mail order. My partner-in-science Tito Jankowski built one too, and did some test runs with food colouring which enabled him to separate the individual dyes which make up different colours. (The molecules in food colouring are pretty small, which is why the bands in Tito's video are a little smeary. He used agarose -- an edible, seaweed-derived polymer which you can find on the shelf in any Asian grocery store, also sold as "vegan gelatin" -- as his gel, and agarose is better suited to larger molecules like DNA. But it's definitely a proof of concept!)

Still, electrophoresis using large rectangular gels has some drawbacks. It's a bit messy, and in order to recover the particular band of DNA you want, you have to slice it out of the gel with a razor blade or something similar. Cleaning up the equipment is also a bit of a pain. If you're using acrylamide or polyacrylamide (common for protein electrophoresis), you need to find a safe way to get the used gel out of the gel carrier and dispose of it properly. Also, while DNA electrophoresis is run horizontally, protein electrophoresis is done vertically, so that means two different pieces of equipment.

This was a recent topic of discussion on the DIYbio mailing list. Ben Lipkowitz wondered whether it would be possible to use a narrow, rigid tube to contain the gel, rather than a big carrier. This would allow for the use of less buffer and lower voltage, since a physically smaller amount of gel is a smaller resistor.

Well, what's a narrow rigid tube that's easy for anyone to acquire? A clear drinking straw! Paper clips make for appropriately sized electrodes, and since a drinking straw is rigid, it can be used in either the horizontal or the vertical orientation. For extra bonus points, when you're ready to cut a band out of the gel, no need for mucking around with razor blades -- just take a (sterile) pair of scissors, snip snip, and you're done! Plus, disposal is extra simple, even with polyacrylamide -- just dispose of the entire straw, gel and all, properly.

Tito Jankowski tried this out, using a single 9V battery as a power supply, and after some debugging, it worked beautifully. (He also used alligator clips as electrodes, and they worked just fine.) We're calling these "keiki gels" because they're so small and cute -- and so simple, even a little kid can do them.

This is crowdsourced science at its very finest. Behold the power of collaboration!

Tito's keiki gels!


ETA: Tito wrote a protocol, doo dah, doo dah

[identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com 2009-02-10 06:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Yep. I linked the design docs in the original post -- it's the one from the University of Utah.

[identity profile] cathshaffer.livejournal.com 2009-02-10 06:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, so your bands are smeary in both. The probably means it's the agar. If your DNA bands are smeary as well, you'll probably want to upgrade to agarose.

[identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com 2009-02-10 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Yep, proper agarose is on the list too. (There's got to be a way to separate out agarose from the other polymers in agar-agar, but that probably falls into the "too much hassle, just buy it from a supplier" category.)

[identity profile] cathshaffer.livejournal.com 2009-02-10 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Here's an easy protocol for home electrophoresis:

http://www.nexusresearchgroup.com/fun_science/electrophoresis.htm

There's also a nice picture of a gel run with food coloring dyes.

I think you would really enjoy taking some classes in biochemistry and genetics. The theoretical grounding would help you make better decisions about your techniques and goals, even if you do continue working in your home.

[identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com 2009-02-10 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I understand that you're trying to help, but I can't help but feel a little insulted by your last remark there. I don't pretend to be an expert biologist by any stretch of the imagination, but I did spend three years as a bioinformaticist at IDT, have had a couple of bioinformatics publications, and spent most of last year working in a proteomics group.

That said, I'm proud to be an amateur. My ultimate goals are exploration, learning, and lowering the barrier to entry for other people. I'm also fundamentally an autodidact. Some of my projects will fail. Some of them will succeed up to a point and get no further. And, frankly, I'm okay with that. Hell, Real Scientists(tm) have that problem too. (Being a Real Scientist(tm) in another field, I feel I can say that with authority. ;) )

[identity profile] cathshaffer.livejournal.com 2009-02-10 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I'm certainly not going to apologize for suggesting you enroll in classes in a subject that you obviously love quite a bit. Bioinformatics is a really distinct field from biochemistry/molecular biology. I have B.S. and M.S. degrees in Biochemistry and have taught introductory lecture and lab classes in the field. I've also done research in academic and industrial laboratories, and I now earn my living by freelance writing in the field of biotechnology. It's hard enough to a successful cloning experiment, say, when you have all of the resources of a multi-billion dollar company at your fingertips, including a high tech sequencing core facility, every type of instrument and freezers full of all of the reagents and supplies you can use. The reality of research is such that it fails...over and over again, even when you're doing everything right, and you end up tweaking extremely fiddly details in order to finally get where you want to go. Having the tools to do the work is not the real hurdle.

I'm not trying to insult you, but I will say that you will be more successful if you have a theoretical grounding in the science. So you are an autodidact. What have you read? Maybe I can give you some recommendations.

Amateur research

(Anonymous) 2009-05-19 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)
If you don't include my childhood I have been involved with amateur and professional research and development for over 30 years. I have designed and built a great many things in the basement I was told could not be done, yet often I got excellent results. I am a engineer with a background in instrumentation. When someone tells me something can not be done I become very curious, I want to know why. I have found they will usually give me clues as to how to make the system work better. Oddly enough I would have to say the key to my success has more to do with my abilities to build a model of a system and modeling the data from a system in a computer than my design expertise. Although building a model from theory has its advantages (especially at the start), when you are breaking new ground it will usually get in your way as you start making attempts to improve the system. What I see is an opprotunity for dirt cheap automation.