maradydd: (Default)
[personal profile] maradydd
Prompted by a discussion with [livejournal.com profile] bunnykitteh, who's good at prompting these kinds of things:

Imagine a Facebook and/or MySpace application aimed at organising flash mobs for political action (e.g., the kind of thing Anonymous might use to quickly notify members of imminent $cientology activity in a particular location). What features should it have? (Twitter gateway?)

(Note that with Facebook, especially, there are all kinds of interesting concerns with respect to privacy...)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-11 04:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com
I think this is the part where [livejournal.com profile] enochsmiles or [livejournal.com profile] ephermata or [livejournal.com profile] allonymist or [livejournal.com profile] sjmurdoch or [livejournal.com profile] tshb hits us over the head with papers that I, at least, should have read already.

(You have an excuse, you're a topologist. I came at security from formal language theory, that's my problem.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-11 04:14 am (UTC)
michiexile: (Default)
From: [personal profile] michiexile
I used to be a salaried cryptographer. One major reason I'm throwing myself into this debate and dropping buzzwords as I go.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-11 04:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com
Oh. Well then. We should formalize what the actual problem is. It looks to me like a zero-knowledge proof of legitimate usership -- which, as [livejournal.com profile] enochsmiles pointed out, has the zeroth-step problem of who constitutes a legitimate user to start with.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-12 12:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jrtom.livejournal.com
Agreed that the actual problem is not yet specified. Stronger, even: we haven't yet specified the users' requirements (from which we will derive the problems that need to be solved, etc.).

That is: there's a whole thread here which seems to be suggesting that there will be privacy guarantees and possibly identity verification measures...but nothing specific.

(Which is fine, this started out as you asking for possible features; I'm just suggesting that we may want to back up a bit.)

Profile

maradydd: (Default)
maradydd

September 2010

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415 161718
19202122232425
26 27282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags