maradydd: (Default)
[personal profile] maradydd
Dear advertisers who use 400px high Javascript banners that slide up from the bottom of the page I'm reading:

I am using a netbook. So are several million other people. Your ads cover literally half of our screens' real estate. This does not endear me to your product, whatever it is. You could be offering free kittens dunked in marshmallow creme with 500-euro notes tied to their tails and I would miss out on your offer, because your ads are so annoying that I close them before even looking at what you're selling. As you probably learned in Marketing 101, if your target audience does not look at your ad, sales will not improve. I recommend you go back to the drawing board.

Dear content providers who use such ads, such as newscientist.com:

This means you too.

No love,
Meredith

(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-06 02:14 pm (UTC)
ext_157608: (Default)
From: [identity profile] sfllaw.livejournal.com
Add that shit to Adblock Plus!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-06 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maradydd.livejournal.com
AdSweep for Chrome didn't handle it. I may have to break down and set up a privoxy filter the hard way. :(

(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-06 02:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fanlain.livejournal.com
Why not just cut out the marketing teams that think this is a good idea?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-07 12:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] porysski.livejournal.com
Or better yet, cut up the marketing teams that think this is a good idea. Woodchippers are cheap.

True

Date: 2009-10-10 01:01 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That bothers me too when i'm trying to read some article on a local newpapers' website.
Daan

Profile

maradydd: (Default)
maradydd

September 2010

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415 161718
19202122232425
26 27282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags